To be sure, “aretology” (also called “aretaics”) is said to be “[t]hat part of moral philosophy
which treats virtue, its nature, and the means of attaining to it.” It is thus only
too natural that one also talks of “Buddhist aretology” inasmuch a greater
part of Buddhist doctrine deals precisely with this topic, and in fact with a
great degree of sophistication. I am thinking of the Buddhist ideas of śīla
(or śīlapāramitā), adhiśīla, saṃvara, samaya, and
so on. I intend to return to this page and add points as and when I find time. For
now, I wish to merely record and reserve the term “Buddhist
aretology” that I need.
No comments:
Post a Comment