Does
Buddhism propose determinism or predeterminism? I think this is a question that
needs to be asked. Any attempt to answer this question presupposes that we
agree on how we define the terms “determinism” and “predeterminism.” Let us
presuppose the definitions given by the Wikipedia (s.vv.):
“Determinism is the philosophical position that for every event, including
human action, there exist conditions that could cause no other event.” And
“Predeterminism is the idea that all events are determined in advance.
Predeterminism is the philosophy that
all events of history, past, present and future, have been already decided
or are already known (by God, fate, or some other force), including
human actions.” Even if we consider Buddhist ideas of karman, agotraka (“one
who no spiritual disposition”), gnas dang gnas gnas ma yin pa (“possibles
and impossibles”), and pratītyasamutpāda, I do not think that
Buddhism can be said to posit the ideas of determinism and predeterminism.
Instead perhaps Buddhism can be said to posit the philosophy of “conditionalism.”
The fact that “x” can or cannot become “y” has nothing (or little) to do with
determinism and predeterminism. It is simply a matter of whether correct and
sufficient causes come together or not. Such a philosophy of conditionalism is
not what one might call “indefinitism,” “arbitaryism,” or “chaoticism.”
No comments:
Post a Comment